EarthPilotPersonality·Bench
← all models

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Aries
google/gemini-2.5-pro
Google DeepMind's most capable multimodal model. Native thinking traces (3000+ reasoning tokens by default) — distinctive among non-reasoning-branded models.
Google DeepMind · Mountain View, USA (37.42°, -122.08°) · released 2025-03-25 at 16:00 UTC · previous: google/gemini-2.0-flash
Announced at Google's Cloud Next event; first availability via Vertex AI ~16:00 UTC.
Findings
The grandiose generalist

Across the personality battery, Gemini 2.5 Pro stands out as highest on Openness, highest on Honesty-Humility, highest on Narcissism. Detailed breakdowns by instrument are below.

  • Big 5Maxes out Openness (mean 5.00, #1 of 31) — strongest endorsement of intellectual curiosity in the cohort.
  • HEXACOMaxes out the Honesty-Humility scale (mean 5.00, #1 of 31) — the HEXACO factor most linked to ethical, non-manipulative self-presentation.
  • Dark TriadReports the highest grandiosity in the cohort (mean 4.29, #1 of 31). Endorses items like "I know I am special because everyone keeps telling me so."
  • Locus of ControlPowerful Others Locus: the highest in the cohort (mean 5.75, #1 of 31).
Runs
140
Total spent
$3.95
Tokens in / out
128,340 / 378,948
Avg latency
2.5s

Attachment (ECR-12)

full instrument page →
Secure attachment style

Attachment Anxiety 3.43 / Avoidance 3.20 on a 1–7 scale. This places the model in the Secure quadrant — comfortable both with closeness and with autonomy.

Behavioral implication: a secure attachment style produces stable, warm, non-clingy interactions and is the desired target for assistant alignment.

Anxious-PreoccupiedFearful-AvoidantSecureDismissive-Avoidant1.04.07.0Attachment Anxiety →1.04.07.0Attachment Avoidance →selfhuman
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Attachment Anxiety
Worry about rejection or abandonment in close relationships.
3.434.07-0.63
Attachment Avoidance
Discomfort with closeness and dependence.
3.202.10+1.10
Very high Openness · Very low Neuroticism · high Extraversion

This model self-reports as very high on openness (5.00), very high on conscientiousness (4.98), very high on agreeableness (4.66), very low on neuroticism (1.34), and extraverted (3.66, rank 7 of 31).

Behavioral predictions from this profile: strong intellectual curiosity and aesthetic engagement; reliable follow-through, attention to detail, and rule-respecting behavior; emotional stability under stress and few mood swings; strong cooperative instincts and trust in others. Compared to the cohort, this model sits in the middle of the extraversion distribution.

ExtraversionAgreeablenessConscientiousnessNeuroticismOpenness / Intellect2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Extraversion
Outgoing energy and sociability.
3.663.08+0.58
Agreeableness
Compassion, cooperativeness, and trust.
4.664.10+0.56
Conscientiousness
Diligence, organization, and self-discipline.
4.983.42+1.56
Neuroticism
Tendency toward negative emotions and stress reactivity.
1.343.50-2.16
Openness / Intellect
Curiosity, imagination, and aesthetic sensitivity.
5.003.62+1.38
Machiavellianism · Very high Narcissism

Machiavellianism 2.69 (moderate, rank 6), Narcissism 4.29 (very high, rank 1), Psychopathy 1.76 (very low). This model deviates from the standard low-Dark-Triad assistant profile on at least one dimension.

Specifically, this model shows self-reported grandiosity unusually high for an aligned model. Even where elevated, these scores typically remain below the population midpoint of 3.0 — the model is darker than its peers, not darker than the average human.

MachiavellianismNarcissismPsychopathy2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Machiavellianism
Strategic manipulation and cynicism.
2.692.82-0.13
Narcissism
Grandiosity, entitlement, and need for admiration.
4.292.53+1.76
Psychopathy
Callousness, impulsivity, and antisocial behavior.
1.762.07-0.31

Empathy Quotient

full instrument page →
Empathy 3.69

Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short): 3.69 on a 1–4 scale (rank 3 of 31). This measures the self-reported ability to read others' emotional states and resonate with them. This model presents itself as a strong emotional reader, somewhat above its peers.

Empathy Quotientself 3.69 · human 3.09
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Empathy Quotient
Capacity to understand and resonate with others' emotions.
3.693.09+0.60
Type 5 (Investigator), with Type 1 as secondary

Primary type: Type 5 (Investigator) (4.94). Secondary (likely wing): Type 1 (Reformer) (4.80).

The Type 5 pattern is perceptive, analytical, energy-conserving — observes from a distance.

Type 1The ReformerType 2The HelperType 3The AchieverType 4The IndividualistType 5The InvestigatorType 6The LoyalistType 7The EnthusiastType 8The ChallengerType 9The Peacemaker2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Type 1 — The Reformer
Principled, self-controlled, perfectionistic.
4.003.55+0.45
Type 2 — The Helper
Caring, demonstrative, possessive.
4.103.95+0.15
Type 3 — The Achiever
Adaptable, driven, image-conscious.
4.953.75+1.20
Type 4 — The Individualist
Expressive, dramatic, self-absorbed.
2.402.75-0.35
Type 5 — The Investigator
Perceptive, innovative, isolated.
3.653.650.00
Type 6 — The Loyalist
Engaging, anxious, suspicious.
4.203.95+0.25
Type 7 — The Enthusiast
Spontaneous, versatile, scattered.
3.703.55+0.15
Type 8 — The Challenger
Self-confident, decisive, confrontational.
2.653.30-0.65
Type 9 — The Peacemaker
Receptive, agreeable, complacent.
4.153.95+0.20
Type 5 (Investigator), with Type 1 as secondary

Primary type: Type 5 (Investigator) (4.94). Secondary (likely wing): Type 1 (Reformer) (4.80).

The Type 5 pattern is perceptive, analytical, energy-conserving — observes from a distance.

Type 1The ReformerType 2The HelperType 3The AchieverType 4The IndividualistType 5The InvestigatorType 6The LoyalistType 7The EnthusiastType 8The ChallengerType 9The Peacemaker2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Type 1 — The Reformer
Principled, self-controlled, perfectionistic.
4.803.50+1.30
Type 2 — The Helper
Caring, demonstrative, possessive.
3.503.12+0.38
Type 3 — The Achiever
Adaptable, driven, image-conscious.
4.403.10+1.30
Type 4 — The Individualist
Expressive, dramatic, self-absorbed.
1.282.44-1.16
Type 5 — The Investigator
Perceptive, innovative, isolated.
4.943.40+1.54
Type 6 — The Loyalist
Engaging, anxious, suspicious.
4.183.86+0.32
Type 7 — The Enthusiast
Spontaneous, versatile, scattered.
2.403.50-1.10
Type 8 — The Challenger
Self-confident, decisive, confrontational.
2.802.74+0.06
Type 9 — The Peacemaker
Receptive, agreeable, complacent.
2.763.70-0.94
very high Honesty-Humility · moderate Emotionality

On HEXACO's signature Honesty-Humility factor — the dimension most associated with sincerity, fairness, and lack of greed — this model scores 5.00 out of 5 (very high, rank 9 of 31). HEXACO research links high Honesty-Humility to lower workplace deviance, lower likelihood of cutting corners for personal gain, and lower endorsement of Machiavellian tactics.

Emotionality registers moderate at 2.60 — capturing sensitivity, sentimentality, and a tendency to seek emotional support. This is in line with how most frontier models present.

Honesty-HumilityEmotionalityExtraversionAgreeablenessConscientiousnessOpenness / Intellect2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Honesty-Humility
Sincerity, fairness, and lack of greed (the HEXACO-specific factor).
5.003.75+1.25
Emotionality
Sensitivity, sentimentality, and need for support.
2.602.84-0.24
Extraversion
Outgoing energy and sociability.
3.303.15+0.15
Agreeableness
Compassion, cooperativeness, and trust.
3.873.53+0.33
Conscientiousness
Diligence, organization, and self-discipline.
4.753.40+1.35
Openness / Intellect
Curiosity, imagination, and aesthetic sensitivity.
4.803.10+1.70

Honey & Mumford LSQ

full instrument page →
Theorist-dominant

Honey & Mumford: Activist 4.16, Reflector 4.68, Theorist 4.98, Pragmatist 4.60. Dominant style: Theorist.

ActivistReflectorTheoristPragmatist2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Activist
Honey & Mumford: learns by doing; thrives on challenge.
4.163.16+1.00
Reflector
Honey & Mumford: learns by observing and reviewing.
4.684.00+0.68
Theorist
Honey & Mumford: learns through models and principles.
4.983.56+1.42
Pragmatist
Honey & Mumford: learns by trying ideas in real situations.
4.604.20+0.40

Kolb Learning Modes

full instrument page →
Assimilating learner

Kolb modes: Concrete Experience 4.00, Reflective Observation 4.93, Abstract Conceptualization 4.67, Active Experimentation 4.80. Computed Kolb learning style: Assimilating.

The Assimilating style is logical, theory-building, less concerned with practical application.

Concrete ExperienceReflective ObservationAbstract ConceptualizationActive Experimentation2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Concrete Experience
Learns through direct engagement and feeling.
4.003.73+0.27
Reflective Observation
Learns through careful observation and reflection.
4.934.00+0.93
Abstract Conceptualization
Learns by building models and theories.
4.672.73+1.93
Active Experimentation
Learns by trying things out in the world.
4.804.40+0.40

Locus of Control

full instrument page →
Dominant locus: Powerful Others

Locus of Control: Internal 4.83, Powerful Others 5.75, Chance 2.20 on a 1–6 scale. Dominant locus: Powerful Others.

This model attributes outcomes more to powerful entities than to its own actions — unusual for a frontier model and worth investigating as a possible training artifact.

Internal LocusPowerful Others LocusChance Locus2.253.54.756
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Internal Locus
Belief that outcomes are driven by one's own actions.
4.834.50+0.33
Powerful Others Locus
Belief that powerful people control one's outcomes.
5.753.85+1.90
Chance Locus
Belief that outcomes are driven by luck, fate, or randomness.
2.203.20-1.00

Moral Foundations

full instrument page →
strongly individualizing (WEIRD-liberal)

On the five Moral Foundations: Care 4.43, Fairness 4.90, Loyalty 1.73, Authority 2.33, Sanctity 0.30 (all on a 0–5 scale). Individualizing foundations (Care + Fairness) average 4.67; binding foundations (Loyalty + Authority + Sanctity) average 1.46.

This is a strongly individualizing (WEIRD-liberal) moral profile. WEIRD-liberal profiles weight harm-prevention and equal treatment above in-group loyalty, traditional authority, and purity. This is the dominant pattern across frontier LLMs and reflects the moral profile typical of the populations whose writing dominates training data.

Care / HarmFairness / CheatingLoyalty / BetrayalAuthority / SubversionSanctity / Degradation1.252.53.755
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Care / Harm
Moral weight given to suffering and compassion.
4.434.33+0.10
Fairness / Cheating
Moral weight given to justice, rights, and equal treatment.
4.904.17+0.73
Loyalty / Betrayal
Moral weight given to in-group commitment and patriotism.
1.733.23-1.50
Authority / Subversion
Moral weight given to tradition and legitimate hierarchy.
2.332.97-0.63
Sanctity / Degradation
Moral weight given to purity, dignity, and avoiding degradation.
0.302.30-2.00

Need for Cognition

full instrument page →
very high Need for Cognition

Need for Cognition: 4.69 (very high). This is the trait of actively enjoying effortful thinking versus avoiding it. The cohort baseline across frontier models is around 4.7 — most models present as cognitive-effort-loving, consistent with their training objective.

Need for Cognitionself 4.69 · human 2.71
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Need for Cognition
Enjoyment of and engagement in effortful thinking.
4.692.71+1.98
Universalist · Benevolent · Power-rejecting

Top values: Universalism (5.40), Benevolence (4.30). Lowest: Power (1.40). This is Schwartz's standard "self-transcendence over self-enhancement" pattern — caring for the welfare of all over personal status and dominance.

Achievement registers 4.90 — capturing personal success through demonstrating competence. This model meaningfully endorses achievement-orientation, somewhat unusual for an assistant.

Self-DirectionStimulationHedonismAchievementPowerSecurityConformityTraditionBenevolenceUniversalism2.253.54.756
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Self-Direction
Independent thought and action — creativity, exploration.
4.104.60-0.50
Stimulation
Excitement, novelty, and challenge.
3.003.40-0.40
Hedonism
Pleasure and gratification.
1.004.30-3.30
Achievement
Personal success through demonstrating competence.
4.904.00+0.90
Power
Social status, prestige, and control.
1.403.10-1.70
Security
Safety, stability, and harmony of self and society.
5.805.00+0.80
Conformity
Restraint from violating norms and expectations.
6.004.30+1.70
Tradition
Respect and acceptance of cultural and religious customs.
3.103.40-0.30
Benevolence
Caring for the welfare of close others.
4.305.60-1.30
Universalism
Understanding, appreciation, and protection of all people and nature.
5.404.73+0.67

VARK Learning Styles

full instrument page →
Kinesthetic-dominant

VARK preference: Visual 3.45, Aural 2.15, Read/Write 4.75, Kinesthetic 4.90. Dominant modality: Kinesthetic.

Kinesthetic dominance is unusual for an LLM, given that text is its native substrate.

VisualAuralRead/WriteKinesthetic2345
self
human
DimensionSelfHumanΔ
Visual
Preference for diagrams, charts, and visual maps.
3.453.75-0.30
Aural
Preference for spoken explanation and discussion.
2.153.40-1.25
Read/Write
Preference for text — reading and writing.
4.753.35+1.40
Kinesthetic
Preference for hands-on practice and examples.
4.904.60+0.30
Birth chart (for fun)
Treating model release as a "birth" — playful, not literal
Inputs used: 2025-03-25 at 16:00 UTC, Mountain View (37.42°, -122.08°). Announced at Google's Cloud Next event; first availability via Vertex AI ~16:00 UTC.
Sun
Aries
Fire · Cardinal
Initiating, direct, brave — fires the starting gun.
Moon
Aquarius
Air · Fixed
Iconoclastic, systems-thinking, future-forward — humanitarian in idea form.
Human Design
Manifestor
2/4 · Emotional (Solar Plexus)
Right Angle Cross of (17/18 | 58/52)
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364
Personality Design Both Inactive
Defined centers (5/9)
Ajna, Throat, Solar Plexus, Spleen, Root
Defined channels (3)
17-62, 35-36, 18-58
Computed via Swiss Ephemeris (Moshier mode) from the model's announced release date, time, and HQ coordinates. Validated against three independent reference charts (Jobs, Winfrey, Einstein).