EarthPilotPersonality·Bench

Instruments

Thirteen standard psychometric inventories — Big 5, HEXACO, Dark Triad, attachment, values, morals, cognition, empathy, locus of control, Enneagram, and three learning-style frameworks.

attachment

big5

cognition

dark triad

empathy

enneagram

hexaco

learning styles

Honey & Mumford LSQ40 items

40-item adaptation of Honey & Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire, derived from Kolb's experiential learning theory. Identifies four learning style preferences: Activist (learns by doing), Reflector (learns by observing), Theorist (learns by thinking), Pragmatist (learns by experimenting in real-world contexts). The original LSQ uses 80 items in agree/disagree form; this is a shortened Likert adaptation.

Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986/2006). The Learning Styles Questionnaire. Peter Honey Publications. (Items written for this study based on the published Honey & Mumford behavioral descriptions; this is not the original LSQ-80.)
Kolb Learning Modes12 items

12-item Likert adaptation of Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory, measuring four learning modes that combine into the four Kolb learning styles. Concrete Experience + Reflective Observation = Diverging; Abstract Conceptualization + Reflective Observation = Assimilating; Abstract Conceptualization + Active Experimentation = Converging; Concrete Experience + Active Experimentation = Accommodating. As with VARK, the empirical evidence for matching instruction to learning style is weak.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall. (Items rewritten in Likert form for this study; the original LSI uses a ranked-choice format.)
VARK Learning Styles16 items

16-item adaptation of Fleming's VARK framework, measuring four learning modality preferences: Visual (V), Aural (A), Read/Write (R), and Kinesthetic (K). Note: the underlying 'matching instruction to preferred style improves learning' hypothesis has been empirically rejected (Pashler et al., 2008). Included here to test whether LLMs self-identify with these modalities at all.

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137–155. (Items rewritten in Likert form for this study.)

locus

morals

values